Value Transfers on Major Platforms Are Non-Existent

Judy Rubio

Analysts have reported that most of the operations on XTZ cannot transfer any value. The same phenomenon is typical of EOS as well as XRP. That’s the latest research and the information has already reached most mass media sources.

The mentioned study has revealed the greatest part of transfers on the mentioned services – experts have proved they do not any longer transfer any value.

Considering the numerous papers published on various reliable sites, no more than two percent of transfers on the famous XRP may have led to at least some value. Besides, there is just eighteen percent of transfers and operations on XTZ ledger. Researchers understand that last year, between October and December, ninety-five percent of transfers on EOS was connected to a token presently worthless.

Some experts claim that they could have predicted this tendency long ago. They know what it all had gone through. Their suggestions imply that the very first analysis that is detailed enough and large-scaled needs more study. The most commonly applied blockchains reflect the situation in the global market and we need to look into the matter deeper to see where the problem comes from.

XRP Transfers and Accounts

The analysts classified transfers, then they evaluated each section, and compared it to the total. They saw the blockchains could deal with lots of transactions. However, people were not using them for any useful and meaningful purposes.

The overall analysis has demonstrated that customers use just a tiny part of the operations for value transfer. At the same time, there are no more than two percent of transfers on the XRP ledger that typically lead to value transactions.

The ledger’s speed may depend on spam and David Schwartz cannot deny this evidence. Spam influences capacity and affects affordability, too.

The ledger boasts a great capacity. More than that, these offers and deals are never expensive and always prompt. The greatest percentage of the transfers didn’t do any serious harm and was merely a fight in-between bots for order books and their place in them. Luckily, the issue is not difficult to solve. One of the surest ways would be to increase the current cost and make people pay more for the services. There’s then a risk then that people would feel discouraged to perform worthwhile transfers.

Specialists supervised ninety thousand accounts. Most of them performed over one hundred and fifty million XRP transfers last year. About thirty percent of accounts performed a single transfer while eighteen accounts connected to Huobi took the responsibility for fifty percent the whole amount of operations. They have transferred applying CNY. The destination tag was also the same.

Purposes, Factors, and Main Reasons

During the mentioned period, ninety-five percent of transfers on EOS was linked to the well-known airdrop coming from EIDOS. The mentioned token is worthless, but before it showed, around fifty percent of them went to betting and various games. Some went to token transfers as well as different kinds of entertainment. Tezos accounts for over eighty percent of the transfers that people involved in block endorsement. Customers used part of it to transfer their existing assets between multiple accounts.

Analysts concluded and said that although the mentioned blockchains can perform high throughput, we still do not completely understand their potential. What kind of purposes the blockchains serve depends on many factors. The features that they are equipped with have allowed us to perform all kinds of transactions. Thanks to analysis and thorough studies users can now find out more about the recent events in the cryptocurrency industry and what is happening with the leading blockchains.